Menu
Map
Although the evidence from the New Testament for the deity of Christ is abundant, many people wonder why Jesus didn’t come out and say explicitly, “I am God.” Opponents of the doctrine of the Trinity often claim that Jesus’ failure to make such an explicit statement is proof that the Trinity is false. Some go further, insisting that the only statement that would satisfy them is if Jesus had said, “I am Almighty God, God the Son, second person of the Trinity.” Of course, since everyone knows there is no such statement by Jesus in the Bible, this objection is a simple way of dismissing the case for the Trinity.
There are several important responses to be made to this objection.
1. Anti-Trinitarians are unwilling to shoulder a similar burden of proof. There is no statement in the Bible, for example, in which Jesus asserts, “I am not God, but only his firstborn created son” (as Jehovah’s Witnesses maintain), or “I am only a human being whom God has appointed as his representative” (as Unitarians traditionally claim). For some reason, anti-Trinitarians impose a different set of rules on Trinitarians than they are willing to follow themselves.
2. Anti-Trinitarians usually have developed interpretive strategies that allow them to slough off even the most explicit assertions in the Bible of the identity of Jesus Christ as God. Thus, when the Bible says that the preincarnate Christ “in the beginning…was God” (John 1:1), or quotes Thomas referring to Jesus as “my Lord and my God” (John 20:28), many anti-Trinitarians will admit that Jesus is called “God” in these texts but offer some end-run interpretation around them. For example, they will often claim that Jesus is called “God” only in the sense that he acts as God’s agent or representative. This means that even if Jesus had said “I am God Almighty” these anti-Trinitarians would explain away such a statement as meaning only that Jesus represents God Almighty. Apparently, Jesus was supposed to anticipate and ward off modern anti-Trinitarian views and say, “I am not merely an agent of God Almighty, but am literally and truly God Almighty in the flesh, the second person of the Trinity incarnate.” Again, anti-Trinitarians are operating by a double standard at this point, since of course Jesus does not make such elaborate statements supporting their theology, either.
3. The evidence from the Gospels is that Jesus viewed his mission as primarily that of revealing and glorifying the Father and reconciling his followers to the Father (e.g., Matt. 11:27; John 14:6; 17:4). This is consistent with Paul’s teaching that in becoming a man Christ humbled himself as a servant, rather than seeking to glorify himself (Phil. 2:6-7). Furthermore, the very notion that Jesus was God incarnate was such a radical one for first-century Jews that it is not surprising that Jesus would speak about his identity in veiled or indirect ways. Some people might be surprised that Jesus rarely stated in so many words, “I am the Son of God” (John 10:36 is the only such explicit recorded statement; see also Matt. 27:43). Evidently, Jesus’ intention was that his followers would come to grasp his identity over time, as the full significance of his words and actions became clear.
4. Once we set aside unreasonable, anachronistic expectations of how Jesus should have spoken about himself, the evidence that Jesus thought of himself as God (though as distinct from God the Father) is abundant and striking:
This evidence is developed in great detail in my book Putting Jesus in His Place: The Case for the Deity of Christ (Kregel, 2007), co-authored with J. Ed Komoszewski. As we show in that book, the rest of the New Testament develops and confirms what is largely implicit in Jesus’ own statements, that he was indeed the divine Son, God incarnate.