Bible
No Group
This article addresses the most common questions about the reliability of the Bible, including questions about its text and canon, about its agreement with science and history, and about the miracles and resurrection of Christ.
Archaeology
Introductory article on biblical archaeology, addressing some common questions about the historical reliability of the Bible.
A Review of William Dever’s Lives of Ordinary People in Ancient Israel
Authority
The term sola scriptura, meaning “only Scripture” or “Scripture alone,” is a key concept in evangelical Protestant theology. What exactly does it mean? Is this concept itself biblical? Is there any precedent for the idea in church history prior to the Reformation? This article addresses these questions and answers a number of popular objections to the doctrine.
Bible Codes
Canon
Christians accept a set list of books—called the canon—as Scripture. What is the basis for the canon, and what about books that various religious groups argue should be included?
Mormons claim that the Bible is incomplete because it mentions various books that are not found in the Bible. Were any of these books ever regarded as part of the canon of Scripture?
This paper, initially presented at the 1992 Chicago Sunstone Symposium, surveys the Biblical and historical evidence relevant to the LDS Church's teaching of a total apostasy and missing New Testament books.
- Does Belief in a Closed Canon Elevate the Bible above God?
Robert M. Bowman Jr. examines the Filson quote cited by LDS apologists, and carefully and concisely puts it into its proper context, demonstrating how Mormon apologists misuse the quote and misrepresent the thrust of Filson’s arguments.
The Bible is not missing any books; the Mormon scriptures are.
Da Vinci Code
The author's claims that his novel is based on accurate scholarship don't hold up to scrutiny.
Inerrancy
Why should Christians believe that the Bible is without error, and what do we say about such matters as copying mistakes or mistranslations?
No Group
Interpretation
Reviews
J. D. Douglas, editor, New Bible Dictionary — Reviewer David M. Howard, Jr., Ph.D, calls this "the best one-volume Bible dictionary available."
Text
Explains why the process of copying manuscripts in the ancient world, even though it produced copies with many mistakes, does not significantly affect the reliability or meaning of the books of the Bible.
Biblical manuscripts were copied by hand and contained mistakes. Does that make the text of the Bible unreliable? Part 1 of “The Bottom-Line Guide to the Bible.”
- The Mormon View of the Biblical Text
Versions
Brief article listing the best English versions of the Bible and explaining their merits.
For those who don’t want to be told which version to use, this article provides some suggested guidelines to employ.
Different translations of the Bible are a blessing, not a curse, as this article explains.
The text of the Bible is reliable; the Joseph Smith Translation is not.
- Joseph Smith's "Inspired" Revisions to the King James Bible
Smith did his own "inspired" revisions to the King James Bible, claiming to restore it to its original purity. How does his work measure up to ancient Bible manuscripts?
Is the LDS view that the Bible is corrupted and untrustworthy a fair and accurate assessment? Did Joseph's changes to the Bible restore parts that were lost from the original manuscripts? In this response to GP chapter 10 we provide an overview and short evaluation of each of the major Mormon scriptures and how they compare to one another and the Bible.
- Colwell and the New World Translation Revisited
There are many translations of the Bible, and they don’t read exactly the same. How big of a problem is that? Part 2 of “The Bottom-Line Guide to the Bible.”